Mani shankar aiyar biography of christopher

  • Christopher Gordon, US Pro
  • Congress leader Mani Shankar Aiyar's
  • Apart from the bowing and scraping before Modi, influential sections of the Christian clergy in Kerala and Delhi have been abetting the communal agenda. They have joined in the Muslim bashing with baseless allegations of love jihad and narcotic jihad against that community. Moreover, by playing footsie with this majoritarian dispensation, they are helping the BJP obfuscate the truth of its many crimes against Christians across the country.

    One wonders what the Christian Church’s grandees make of Mohan Bhagwat’s recent speech proclaiming that India gained “true Independence” on the date of the Ram temple consecration in Ayodhya. And what of his purported conversation with then President Pranab Mukherjee that, but for ghar wapsi, the Adivasis would have become “anti-national” i.e. by embracing a faith that did not regard India as their holy land (punyabhumi) and as the land of their forefathers (pitrabhumi).

    Can’t they see the writing on the wall? asks Mathew John

    Full piece: https://thewire.in/.../what-are-the-kerala-christians-up-to

    I first heard of Mani Shankar Aiyar sometime in 1990 when I was serving with Mr. I.K. Gujral, the Minister of External Affairs in V.P. Singh’s government. The Pakistan Foreign Minster had called on Mr. Gujral at South Block and they were reminiscing over old times when the conversation turned to Indian diplomats who had served in that country. Somehow, Mani’s (as he was known to both friends and foes alike) name cropped up (he had recently resigned from the IFS and had joined the Congress). The Pakistani Minister chuckled and said: “Oh, Mani! You know, your Excellency, that old adage about Mani being the root of all evil?” And thereby hangs the “maverick” tag!

    Thereafter, I would occasionally read about him in the papers, as he made his way through politics like an IED, but never had the chance to meet him. And then, one day in 2023, he suddenly dropped in at my Mashobra cottage with Mrs. Aiyar and a friend. We spent a couple of very pleasant hours over coffee, leaving me with the impression that here was a man with an almost photographic memory of events, an acerbic sense of humour that could shred a reputation in no time with a few well chosen words, further blessed with the story telling powers of a master raconteur! And these three unusual traits are all too evident in this book. Which makes it eminently interesting and readable; Mani pulls no punches and takes no prisoners!

    This is the second volume of his memoirs. It begins with his joining the Congress and winning his first Parliament election. He is a quick learner for someone handicapped with a career in bureaucracy, is eager to dive deep into his constituency’s problems, to ensure its development by taking initiatives in industrialisation, shrimp farming, food processing, setting up IT units, tourism promotion. He works hard, in the words of a friend does his best to turn “Mayiladuturai first into a Dubai and then a Hawaii” but loses his next elect

    Dear Mr. Mani Shankar Aiyar,

    It is only with great trepidation that I am committing the audacity of addressing a letter to you. I live in a crowded suburb of western Mumbai and am fully aware that I am not fit to live within a radius of 100 km around you. After all, I did not go the Doon School, nor studied at St. Stephens or Cambridge. I was not in Indian Foreign Service for 26 years and cannot count Jawaharlal Nehru’s grandson among my friends.

    In case you are interested, I studied in a Gujarati medium school whose class rooms were part of a chawl inhabited by lower middle class families in a western suburb of Mumbai. My father whom I lost at the age of 9 was accountant in a large shop. My mother worked in a cigarette factory to bring up her three children. I am an office assistant in a small firm. In short, I belong to what you call “People Like Them”, far removed from “People Like Us”.

    According to you, Narendra Modi can distribute tea at AICC session; he can never be PM. As a Congressman, you might have heard of someone called Lal Bahadur Shastri. Hailing from a poor family in a small village in UP, he used to swim the river everyday to reach his school. I read that as the prime minister of the country he died with some uncleared debt. Sarvepalli Radhakrishnan, who became our president, also saw poverty in his childhood. Both were misfits by your standards, no doubt. I have no doubt you would have advised Shastri to take up supplying milk to Congress workers in and around his village, and Dr. Radhakrishnan to take up teaching in some village school in Madras Presidency rather than teaching philosophy at Oxford.

    It is really unfortunate that unlike me, Narendra Modi does not understand his limits. He refuses to believe that if he sold tea in his younger days, he should have continued doing that and not ever dream of becoming prime minister.

    Modi did not know that if he sold tea in his younger days, he should have just continued doing that and

      Mani shankar aiyar biography of christopher

    A Maverick in Politics Photo: Juggernaut Books

    A Maverick in Politics Photo: Juggernaut Books

    A MAVERICK IN POLITICS: 1999-2024 

    Author: Mani Shankar Aiyar 

    Publisher: Juggernaut 

    Mani Shankar Aiyar begins the first chapter of his second volume of memoirs “A Maverick in Politics”, by saying that he was “horrified” when Palestinian leader Yasser Arafat acquiesced at “India’s betrayal of Palestine”. This was in January 1992 when Prime Minister Narasimha Rao (PVNR) announced that India would upgrade India’s relationship with Israel to ambassadorial level at a joint press conference with the visiting Palestinian leader.

    It distressed him since it happened just a day after Arafat had specially invited Aiyar to meet him at the Rashtrapati Bhavan to thank him for “championing the Palestinian cause”. At that time, Aiyar requested Arafat to “tell Prime Minister PVNR to desist from doing so”, meaning not to announce elevation of diplomatic relations. “Arafat’s reaction was ambiguous to the point of being puzzling”. Aiyar was so crestfallen that he asked his wife to put away the mother of pearl tray gifted to him by Arafat “out of human sight”.

    This incident would indicate the author’s deep aversion to what he considers deviation from the original principles of government policy laid down by our founding fathers and his steadfast determination to go alone even if he gets hurt in that process. This is the thread that runs throughout this book which deals with innumerable instances when he had to defiantly chart his own path, as narrated by Rabindranath Tagore in “Ekla Chalo Re”:

    If no one speaks to you, oh thou of evil luck If everyone turns his backs to you and is afraid Then wholeheartedly, you alone speak up what is in your mind (translation by Nikhil Kulkarni).

    Aiyar’s repugnance in 1992 would seem justified when compared with the Palestinians’ sad plight in 2025. However, Aiyar should have realised that Arafat’s t